duckbunny:

amuseoffyre:

I just stumbled on Robert Burns’s response to a reviewer who criticised his ‘obscure language’. Now bear in mind a lot of Burns’s poetry was written in Scots, he took this slightly personally.

Ellisland, 1791.

Dear Sir:

Thou eunuch of language; thou Englishman, who never was south the Tweed;
thou servile echo of fashionable barbarisms; thou quack, vending the
nostrums of empirical elocution; thou marriage-maker between vowels and
consonants, on the Gretna-green of caprice; thou cobler, botching the
flimsy socks of bombast oratory; thou blacksmith, hammering the rivets
of absurdity; thou butcher, embruing thy hands in the bowels of
orthography; thou arch-heretic in pronunciation; thou pitch-pipe of
affected emphasis; thou carpenter, mortising the awkward joints of
jarring sentences; thou squeaking dissonance of cadence; thou pimp of
gender; thou Lyon Herald to silly etymology; thou antipode of grammar;
thou executioner of construction; thou brood of the speech-distracting
builders of the Tower of Babel; thou lingual confusion worse confounded;
thou scape-gallows from the land of syntax; thou scavenger of mood and
tense; thou murderous accoucheur of infant learning; thou ignis fatuus,
misleading the steps of benighted ignorance; thou pickle-herring in the
puppet-show of nonsense; thou faithful recorder of barbarous idiom;
thou persecutor of syllabication; thou baleful meteor, foretelling and
facilitating the rapid approach of Nox and Erebus.

R.B.

THAT is how you do it

The great ancestor of Scottish Twitter.

shelomit:

shelomit:

The off-site material finally came! I did not quite get through the most important folder because of terrible nineteenth-century handwriting, but at least progress was made! I got very close to finishing up my folder, but took the last few minutes before closing time to take some phone-photos as a stop-gap measure. (I can’t take my camera and my umbrella to the archive as things currently stand, so the camera has been staying home when the weather is threatening.) I then spent all afternoon trying to transfer the photos to the computer in hopes of finishing up those transcriptions tonight, only to find that none of them were of good enough quality to use *tears out hair*. I’ll have to work super-efficiently tomorrow if I’m to stay on schedule, although happily the last two spiritual experiences look to be pretty legible. 

I spent the evening in a self-confessedly ridiculous effort of which you-all may hear more tomorrow.

On the plus side, the secretary from the correct church at Sanbornton called me back, as a result of which I have a revised schedule for the weekend:

  • Saturday–Sacred Harp in Vermont in the morning; take off immediately for Sanbornton in the afternoon and then Ashland to see the churches
  • Sunday–Visit Candia and North Hampton cemeteries in the morning; head back to Portland for more Sacred Harp in the afternoon; swim if good weather
  • Monday–Visit Robinhood/Georgetown church in the morning; nip over to Bristol for bookstore; then to Bowdoin to transcribe songster; swim if good weather

Also, I have the most ridiculous academic chore ahead of that weekend: buy a 100-foot tape for church-measuring! 

@jewishhenna said:

said: terrible nineteenth-century handwriting is THE WORST. Enjoy the Sacred Harp!!!

Those of you who took the quiz may appreciate today’s photo haul! 

Philip “Clearly Used to Be a Businessman” Tittcomb: 

J. W. “What’s Spacing?” Windsor:

Samuel Barker “Loop-D-Loop” Wells:

John
D. “Legible with a Learning Curve” Emerson:

Charles “Barely Even Cursive” Jerry:

Lewis “I Had a Penmanship Tutor in the Distant Past” Goodrich:

Samuel W. “Clerical Pencil” Pearson:

C. H. “Lord Have Mercy on Me, a Sinner” Gates: 

J. R. “Literally Did Not Learn to Write until My Twenties” Chalmer: 

Do you ever find yourself liking or disliking long-dead people based on their handwriting? I definitely preferred the employees of the American Consulate in Kobe, Japan who appeared to have trained as clerks. That said, I remain extremely fond of the irrepressible Nathan J. Newitter, Esq. who signed his name like me as a six-year-old.

SPOILERS I really like the production design of this 1995 Glyndbourne Makropulos Affair. I do have to headcannon that the lead singer looks younger to the other characters than she does to the audience; but she’s doing a really interesting/creepy job of suddenly looking *even* older, depending on the angle and expression. I’m trying to decide if the costume designer deliberately made her look ironically younger in her last couple of scenes before death, mainly by virtue of abandoning the skull-hugging scarves and headpieces she wore in the first two acts. I do kind of wish she’d run off with the crazy old Count who seems to be one of the few people she still has human feelings for.

Hi so I wanted to ask you about this because I’m really confused so first I’m a girl I’m straight I think and I’m no asexual because I have sexual feelings or I like sexual intimacy but I don’t like the idea of having someone or something in me (a dick) is it weird or is that normal is anyone else like that??? I’m really confused I need help

ao3tagoftheday:

It is completely normal to have preferences about what kind of sexual activities you want to engage in, and you have no reason to be ashamed about your preferences. That said, this seems to be distressing you, so I’d like to make a few suggestions.

1. If you have experienced some kind of sexual trauma at some point in your life, this could well be related to that trauma. In that case, I encourage you to seek counseling to deal with the aftermath of that trauma.

2. Are you averse to penetration by things other than a penis? If not, try penetrating yourself with your fingers or a toy.

3. Do you experience pain when something penetrates you vaginally? (I don’t even mean just in a sexual context. This can include inserting a tampon or getting a pap smear.) If so, you should speak to your gynecologist.

4. Some people are going to see this and suggest that it means you may not be straight. You’ve told me that you’re straight and my policy is to believe people when they tell me who they are. That said, if you think you may not be straight, you should explore. But don’t fall into the trap of thinking that you can’t be straight because you don’t want to have “normal” straight sex.

5. Finally, this seems to be causing you a great deal of distress. There’s nothing inherently wrong with not wanting to be penetrated by a penis, but there is something wrong if you’re upset. I would absolutely encourage you to speak to a therapist about this. It may be that therapy can help you get more comfortable with the idea of penetration. If not, therapy will certainly be able to help you get more comfortable with yourself and your own sexual preferences.

Household – Chapter 1 – moon_custafer – People Will Talk (1951) [Archive of Our Own]

Chapters: 4/?
Fandom: People Will Talk (1951)
Rating: General Audiences
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Dr. Noah Praetorius/Debra Higgins, Debra Higgins/Prof. Lionel Barker, Dr. Noah Praetorius/Prof. Lionel Barker
Characters: Dr. Noah Praetorius, Debra Higgins, Prof. Lionel Barker, Mr. Shunderson, Original Characters, Arthur Higgins
Additional Tags: Found Family, Atomic Age, The Arc of This Movie Is Long But It Bends Towards Fluff
Summary:

Professor Lionel Barker went to Noah’s house fully prepared to dislike his friend’s new wife.

Series of ficlets, extending over several years.

Household – Chapter 1 – moon_custafer – People Will Talk (1951) [Archive of Our Own]

mildlyartisticsuperdetective:

valentineart89:

theshitpostcalligrapher:

archaeogyrl:

glumshoe:

pipistrellus:

pipistrellus:

“Historical menswear, but hotpants and thigh highs” is such the ideal that I wanna die … this is why I like hnk so much???

This is 100% your brain and not my fault but I’ll take credit if u WANT

@suzirya if you make them I will wear them

Im not saying the answer is Landsknecht but… the answer is Landsknecht

https://casadekissa.wordpress.com/2017/02/16/landsknecht-hot-pants-its-not-all-about-the-booty/

HOLD UP this is exactly my area

@trinitybat oh man I think I finally found it. Medieval German hot pants are totally Taako’s aesthetic

hello friends i recognise that it has been a long time since this post has been in circulation but um.

let me just say that this idea would not let me go.

(i may do a full post for this soon which is why i’m reblogging to my art blog! but, soooo, here is a thing that i made. the watermark is for my instagram btw!)