is that no one is more concerned with the endorsement of monarchy than with the endorsement of poofy dresses. Personally I am far more concerned about the marketing of monarchy than I am about the marketing of poofy dresses.
Why can’t we have the Lucy and Albert Parson’s movie instead?
idk i thought people thought the princess stuff was problematic because it encouraged passivity and dependence on dudes
(which is weird b/c none of my floofy dress fantasies as a child had anything to do with dudes, but it might be different for other women idk)
also agreed re: lucy parsons disney movie
Yeah, years ago I saw a thread asking “why are we encouraging girls to be princesses and not queens?” and a number of commenters pointing out that many countries used to be principalities, i.e. ruled by princes or princesses, and the title didn’t actually mean less power or responsibility, and I kept waiting for someone to post about how monarchy is a bad system anyway, but no one did.
Mooncustafer 